Arms Trade Treaty negotiations threatened by diplomatic Damocles' Sword
A major diplomatic negotiation aiming to regulate the trade in weapons and ammunition is at risk of failing due to member states’ insistence to give every state the right to veto a future treaty, according to the Control Arms coalition.
The Arms Trade Treaty talks, which have been on-going since 2006, came to an abrupt end on the final day of negotiations in July after the US government demanded to have “more time” to conclude a deal. Since then, countries have been discussing the way forward, including rules under which the next diplomatic conference should be negotiated. The co-author governments of the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Kenya, Costa Rica, Finland and Argentina have led the resolution which maintains the right of any member of the United Nations membership to veto agreement when the conference is due to reconvene next year.
The Control Arms coalition has urged member states to meet next year but under normal UN General Assembly Rules of Procedure and not under the so-called consensus rule by which every state must agree. If the conference would operate under UN standard rules and procedures where a majority vote would be possible if consensus could not be reached.
“By insisting on this one rule, governments are reducing their chances of a successful outcome before talks even start. We saw the impact of this rule in July when the US, followed by a small number of countries, prevented the conclusion of a successful conference despite having a majority of states that were then in favour of agreeing for a robust treaty”, said Hector Guerra Network Coordinator of the International Action Network On Small Arms. “We cannot have the next conference taken hostage by any one country. The first ever international treaty to control the flow of weapons and ammunition is too important to let that happen.”
Last July, the month-long negotiation produced a draft text that will very likely be the basis of a 2013 diplomatic conference. While the text is a solid foundation to re-launch the conference, It has some fundamental flaws which must be rectified for the treaty to be effective.
The key loopholes and areas identified by civil society are as follows:
- The Scope of the draft Treaty is too narrow: The draft Treaty only includes arms that fall under the seven categories of major conventional weapons covered by the UN Register of Conventional Arms plus small arms and light weapons. This means that many types of conventional weapons – including armoured troop carrying vehicles and helicopters – are not controlled. Crucially, ammunition and munitions, parts and components are also missing from the scope section of the text so that transfers of these items are exempt from comprehensive risk assessments, as well as record-keeping and reporting requirements.
- The threshold to assess risks of human rights and humanitarian law violations is unclear: The draft treaty sets a threshold of “overriding risk” that states could interpret as requiring the refusal of a transfer only in extreme and exceptional circumstances.
- Exemptions for ‘defence cooperation agreements’ which would leave several important defence deals out of the treaty: This loophole could allow States to classify all of their arms trading operations as “defence cooperation agreements” thereby circumventing the Treaty’s provisions.
- Reporting requirements will do little to enhance transparency in the international arms trade: The draft treaty makes no explicit provision for public reporting and exempts reporting on ammunition and parts and components transfers. Exemptions for ‘national security’ and ‘commercially sensitive’ data pose the risk that states will withhold vital information even from the secretariat and other countries.
- Entry into Force (EIF) requirement of 65 is too high: This means that it could be many years before the Treaty can enter into force; a requirement for 30 states to ratify for EIF is the practice under some other instruments and would be more appropriate for the ATT.
“Major exporters have a responsibility to step up to the plate and fix these problems and ensure that a future Arms Trade Treaty establishes the strongest norm possible on international arms trading,” said Jeff Abramson, Director of the Control Arms Secretariat.
“One person dies every minute as a result of armed violence, with thousands more abused and injured every day. The impact of the $4 billion a year trade in ammunition is felt strongest by the poorest people in the world, particularly those living in conflict-hit or fragile states. There is a risk of a diplomatic groundhog day if governments do not change their approach and get this Treaty agreed as a matter of urgency, " said Anna Macdonald, Head of Arms Control for Oxfam.
Notes to Editors
Control Arms is a global civil society alliance campaigning for an Arms Trade Treaty that will protect lives and livelihoods, an international legally-binding agreement that will stop transfers of arms and ammunitions that fuel conflict, poverty and serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law.
Apple under scrutiny for #taxdodging, shows “unbelievable chutzpah.” http://t.co/XIL06OCU1A @nytimes #taxhavens20 min 7 sec ago
#Lille France-UK #Transparency Conference: Follow our @benphillips76 @LucLampriere @HannahStoddart. See also @pcanfin #landgrabs #taxdodging2 hours 13 min ago
Pls consider donating to our #SyriaCrisis Appeal. $10 covers basic needs items for 1 person for a month http://t.co/HtJ1uzYBpa2 hours 24 min ago
UN has now registered +1.3m #refugees. One of them, Leka'a, has kindly shared her v personal story w us http://t.co/TQHewOBFIc #SyriaCrisis2 hours 57 min ago
#Hunger will be the face of the future without govt & aid policy reform http://t.co/ryFcadlsXF MT @TR_Foundation via @katymigiro4 hours 32 min ago
RT @OxfamEAfrica: The great @Oxfam team at the #AUSummit this week - @mynassah @ShuksG @MuleyaM @JMwanjisi @NicholasNgigi @assodesire @Ja…4 hours 57 min ago
#Cyclone Mahasen: we're working with #Bangladesh govt & other agencies to assess needs http://t.co/I1orTbX0HJ #humanitarian5 hours 52 min ago
RT @oxfamgbpress: The most fearless women on earth http://t.co/72kW0cBMdW via @Fabulousmag includes an Afghan woman who works with @Oxfam6 hours 10 min ago
#India communities most affected by #climate change learning to adapt using #renewable energy http://t.co/QuNn1H8MDe #resilience6 hours 22 min ago
Disasters happen but the #inequality of risk is no accident. Our new report on #resilience http://t.co/XDMrZ3eK7r #climate7 hours 21 min ago
No accident millions at risk 2 disasters: Fundamental shift needed in power/politics http://t.co/NgcQrVEFfy #climate #inequality #resilience7 hours 46 min ago
More on the global land rush: @Global_Witness report on logging in #Cambodia http://t.co/2G6Qm7vHgx @TheEconomist #landgrabs10 hours 8 min ago
How to avoid 'sustainability fatigue': short hit-list for business leaders via @GuardianSustBiz http://t.co/GavVllQYkw #susdev11 hours 8 min ago
RT @revenuewatch: New @Oxfam post explains what works in the fight against #corruption! http://t.co/1nF9FWykjL via @fp2p22 hours 54 min ago
RT @MeatFreeMonday: The Canadian city of Vancouver will be supporting Meat Free Monday on 10 June! http://t.co/zQ2tfrDX8y1 day 40 min ago