Land rights and the supply chains of the biggest food and beverage companies
This paper sets out how one crop – sugar – has been driving large-scale land acquisitions and land conflicts at the expense of small-scale food producers and their families.
At least 4 million hectares of land have been acquired for sugar production in 100 large-scale land deals since 2000, although given the lack of transparency around such deals, the area is likely to be much greater. In some cases, these acquisitions have been linked to human rights violations, loss of livelihoods, and hunger for small-scale food producers and their families.
Major food and beverage companies rarely own land, but they depend on it for the crops they buy, including sugar.
These companies must urgently recognize this problem, and take steps to ensure that land rights violations and conflicts are not part of their supply chains.
Key recommendations
To make sure that their sugar doesn’t lead to land grabs, major food and beverage companies need to:
- Know how their sugar impacts communities’ access to land, and whether they and their suppliers are respecting land rights;
- Show where the ingredients they use come from – and who grows them;
- Act by committing to zero tolerance for land grabs, throughout their supply chains and their own operations, and work with governments and others to do the same.
You may also like
Update! Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Associated British Foods – their intial response to the sugar rush
Read the blog: Coke, Pepsi and ABF: make sure your sugar doesn’t lead to land grabs
